2015 2015-05-22 10.17192/meta.2015.4.2521 urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-0003-2015-108-25218 keine Angabe Individuals, Institutions and Discourses: Knowledge and Power in Russia's Iranian Studies of the Late Imperial, Soviet and Post-Soviet Periods The scholarship on late Imperial Russia's Oriental studies is divided by a disagreement over the applicability of Edward Said's Orientalism to the Russian case. Moreover, in a broader sense, since the mid 1990s, Western scholarship has not been unanimous on the applicability of the underlying Foucauldian notions to late Imperial and Soviet Russia. While presenting a systematic study of Soviet and post-Soviet scholarship (mostly unfamiliar to Western readership), this article offers an assessment of the institutional and individual practices adopted within Russia's Oriental studies from the late nineteenth century to the present. The article aims to provide an analysis that goes far beyond the Saidian restrictive East-West dichotomy and his concept of two-vector relations between knowledge and state power. It offers a new reading, based on the deconstruction of the interplay of the manifold multi-vector power/knowledge relations that is clearly identifiable in Russia's long twentieth-century Iranian studies. Iranian Studies Russo-Iranian Relations Power/Knowledge Soviet Oriental Studies

JournalArticle

3 No restrictions

urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-0003-2015-108-25218 Iranian Studies 2015-05-22 application/pdf English Russo-Iranian Relations 2015-05-22 Universitätsbibliothek Marburg Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Marburg 2015 article Power/Knowledge 2018-01-31 Soviet Oriental Studies https://journals.uni-marburg.de/0003/2015/108/2521/2521.png The scholarship on late Imperial Russia's Oriental studies is divided by a disagreement over the applicability of Edward Said's Orientalism to the Russian case. Moreover, in a broader sense, since the mid 1990s, Western scholarship has not been unanimous on the applicability of the underlying Foucauldian notions to late Imperial and Soviet Russia. While presenting a systematic study of Soviet and post-Soviet scholarship (mostly unfamiliar to Western readership), this article offers an assessment of the institutional and individual practices adopted within Russia's Oriental studies from the late nineteenth century to the present. The article aims to provide an analysis that goes far beyond the Saidian restrictive East-West dichotomy and his concept of two-vector relations between knowledge and state power. It offers a new reading, based on the deconstruction of the interplay of the manifold multi-vector power/knowledge relations that is clearly identifiable in Russia's long twentieth-century Iranian studies. 2015-05-22 PeriodicalPart https://doi.org/10.17192/meta.2015.4.108 2015 4 Vol 4 (2015) Area Studies application/pdf https://journals.uni-marburg.de/0003/2015/108/cover.png urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-0003-2015-1088 2196-629X 2013 Center for Near and Middle Eastern Studies (CNMS) Middle East - Topics + Arguments Periodical General history of Asia; Middle East https://journals.uni-marburg.de/0003/cover.png Deutschhausstraße 9, 35037 Marburg Marburg Philipps-Universität Marburg 2714728-9 urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-00030 Individuals, Institutions and Discourses: Knowledge and Power in Russia's Iranian Studies of the Late Imperial, Soviet and Post-Soviet Periods https://doi.org/10.17192/meta.2015.4.2521 Denis V. Volkov Volkov, Denis V.

PRESERVATION_MASTER VIEW PDF PRESERVATION_MASTER

application/pdf 3467 //journals.uni-marburg.de/0003/article/download/2521/3467 3467

MD5