2003
2015-08-24
10.17192/mjr.2003.8.3727
urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-0004-2003-121-37271
keine Angabe
Seven Logical Consequences of Interreligious Dialoguing: A Taxonomy of Praxis Possibilities
Despite the incredible amount of literature written about interreligious dialoguing, scant critical attention has been devoted to mapping out the potential logical consequences of the enterprise. This is regrettable, especially given the high hopes many expect to achieve through participation. The critical literature from various traditions was reviewed using textual criticism as the analytical lens. Seven logical outcomes were subsequently identified and explicated herein using the following taxonomy. Namely: (a) nothing happened, (b) understanding, (c) insightfulness, (d) tolerance, (e) conversion, (f) frustration, and (g) defection. It was concluded that the a priori understanding of these potential outcomes would significantly moderate future delegate expectations. In addition, professional awareness of the range, depth and contours of these dialogic consequences had important ramifications for both participant preparation and event organisation. Practical suggestions for dealing with various impediments were proffered as appropriate. Further research into this important praxis area was recommended.
2003
urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-0004-2003-121-37271
https://doi.org/10.17192/mjr.2003.8.3727
https://journals.uni-marburg.de/0004/2003/121/3727/3727.png
English
2015-08-24
Despite the incredible amount of literature written about interreligious dialoguing, scant critical attention has been devoted to mapping out the potential logical consequences of the enterprise. This is regrettable, especially given the high hopes many expect to achieve through participation. The critical literature from various traditions was reviewed using textual criticism as the analytical lens. Seven logical outcomes were subsequently identified and explicated herein using the following taxonomy. Namely: (a) nothing happened, (b) understanding, (c) insightfulness, (d) tolerance, (e) conversion, (f) frustration, and (g) defection. It was concluded that the a priori understanding of these potential outcomes would significantly moderate future delegate expectations. In addition, professional awareness of the range, depth and contours of these dialogic consequences had important ramifications for both participant preparation and event organisation. Practical suggestions for dealing with various impediments were proffered as appropriate. Further research into this important praxis area was recommended.
article
Seven Logical Consequences of Interreligious Dialoguing: A Taxonomy of Praxis Possibilities
2015-08-24
8
2003-08-24
https://doi.org/10.17192/mjr.2003.8.1
1
2003
https://journals.uni-marburg.de/0004/2003/121/cover.png
urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-0004-2003-1214
Vol 8 No 1 (2003)
PeriodicalPart
https://journals.uni-marburg.de/0004/cover.png
Institute for Comparative Cultural Research - Study of Religions and Anthropology
Religion
Philosophy and theory of religion
1996
1418722-x
Periodical
urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-00048
Marburg Journal of Religion
1612-2941
Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften und Philosophie
Deutschhausstraße 9, 35037 Marburg
Marburg
Philipps-Universität Marburg
Universitätsbibliothek Marburg
Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Marburg
Anton Karl
Kozlovic
Kozlovic, Anton Karl
2015-08-24
application/pdf
PRESERVATION_MASTER
VIEW
PDF
PRESERVATION_MASTER
application/pdf
3543
//journals.uni-marburg.de/0004/article/download/3727/3543
3543