Thinking Religion and Religious Studies
This article argues religious studies is a discipline specifically designed for answering the big questions about religion. The comparative and general study of religion is what emerges when scholarship abandons the big questions about religion. This occurs first by the field’s distancing from theol...
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | Marburg Journal of Religion |
|---|---|
| Tác giả chính: | |
| Định dạng: | Artikel (Zeitschrift) |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Tiếng Anh |
| Được phát hành: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2025
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Truy cập trực tuyến |
| Các nhãn: |
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Tóm tắt: | This article argues religious studies is a discipline specifically designed for answering the big questions about religion. The comparative and general study of religion is what emerges when scholarship abandons the big questions about religion. This occurs first by the field’s distancing from theology and later philosophy. Historical and phenomenological approaches present religious studies as a pluralistic and multidisciplinary research field, whilst arguably it is originally polymethodic. The difference, I argue, is that the religious studies discipline is better defined by a multiple methods approach rather than a disciplinary hybridity. I make my argument by discussing the philosophical method of “thinking” as necessary to reclaim for religious studies and specifically making the case for thinking as a key method for religious studies research. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.17192/mjr.2025.26.8853 |